Champagne socialist LARPers like Emma Watson and the unhinged zealot Ashley Judd keep telling us about alleged sexist discrimination in the movie industry. That might be true, but not in the way they suggest.
Actress Emily Ratajkowski has called out Hollywood in the latest issue of Harper’s Bazaar Australia for what she claims is its “anti-woman” employment practices, explaining she is sometimes turned down for acting roles because her breasts are “too big.”
In an interview with the Australian magazine, Ratajkowski said she faces gender discrimination in Hollywood, but not because she’s too old or not pretty enough, but because she’s “too sexy.”
Of course this is in keeping with current year directive that women must now at all times only be judged by how manly they are, without any reference being made to their appearance.
I mean let’s just tell the truth here and admit that it’s probably worse than even that. Hollywood is an industry populated by, and ran by, liberal perverts. And Miss Ratajkowski probably wouldn’t have this problem if she’d only play ball and find the right sleazebag producer to ‘impress’.
In the meantime during Emily’s blackballing, we’ll have to make do with the likes of the talented Amy Schumer. Hot women are sexist and backward!